Website and SEO services, bought on evidence

Agencies with a verified published price

How to buy the build and the search work together

1. Decide which side leads. If the current site is the constraint, the build leads and search requirements shape it. If the site is adequate and visibility is the gap, search leads and the build is limited to what unblocks it. Naming the lead prevents a project that does both halves shallowly.
2. Require the search plan before the design phase. Which queries the site must serve, and therefore which templates must exist and how much room the content needs, should be settled before wireframes. Retrofitting content structure into a finished design is the most common avoidable cost in this purchase.
3. Agree the migration plan in writing. Every existing URL that has earned traffic needs a mapped destination and a redirect agreed before the old site comes down. This single document is what separates redesigns that hold their visibility from redesigns that quietly lose a year of it.
4. Check whether both halves are done in house. Many agencies build and subcontract search, or the reverse. That is not disqualifying, but you should know who is accountable and be able to meet the person doing each half before you sign a combined retainer.
5. Set post launch checkpoints. Google notes some changes are reflected within hours while others take several months, so agree a monitoring window with named checkpoints after launch instead of treating go live as the end of the engagement.

One provider or two

Splitting the build and the search work across two suppliers buys depth at the cost of a seam: two roadmaps, two sets of priorities and an argument to be had whenever a technical fix and a design preference collide. A combined provider removes the seam but has to prove depth on both sides, which is exactly what published case detail, printed pricing and its own rankings let you check.

The practical test is to ask each candidate a question from the other discipline. Ask a design led agency how it would handle redirects and internal linking at migration; ask a search led agency how it would keep the content model usable for your editors. The weaker half answers thinly.

Where combined projects usually go wrong

The first failure is a design signed off before anyone decided what the pages had to say, leaving templates with no room for substantial content. Google's starter guide is direct that creating content people find compelling and useful will likely influence a site's presence in results more than any of its other suggestions, so a design that squeezes the words is a design that limits the outcome.

The second is migration handled as an afterthought. The third is the content itself being assumed: a build quote rarely includes writing dozens of pages, and search results depend on those pages existing. Ask explicitly who writes them, how many, and by when.

Judging the combined quote

Ask for the build and the search work to be priced separately even if you buy them together. It lets you compare each half against specialists, exposes which half the agency is really selling, and makes it possible to change one supplier later without renegotiating everything.

Then set expectations that match reality. No agency can promise rankings; Google states plainly that no one can guarantee a number one ranking. What a credible combined provider commits to is a launch on a date, a migration with no lost URLs, an agreed number of pages written and honest reporting from a defined baseline.

Questions people actually ask

Should the same agency build the site and do the SEO?

It removes the seam between the two roadmaps, which is worth a lot, but only if the agency has provable depth on both sides. Test each candidate with a question from the discipline it leads with least and see how thin the answer gets.

Will a redesign hurt our existing rankings?

It can, when URLs change without mapped redirects. Agree the migration document before the old site comes down and monitor afterwards. Google notes some changes are reflected within hours and others take several months.

Does the build quote include the written content?

Often not, and this is the most common gap in combined quotes. Ask how many pages will be written, by whom, and by when, because search performance depends on those pages existing rather than on the templates that would hold them.

How should the combined engagement be priced?

Ask for the build and the ongoing search work to be quoted separately even when bought together. It makes each half comparable with specialist quotes and lets you change one supplier later without reopening the whole arrangement.

Browse agencies by specialty

• SEO agencies with verified facts
• PPC agencies with verified facts
• Social media agencies with verified facts
• Content marketing agencies with verified facts
• Email marketing agencies with verified facts
• Performance marketing agencies with verified facts