Link building companies, compared on evidence

Agencies with a verified published price

How to compare link building providers

1. Ask where the links come from, not how many. A provider doing real outreach can describe the kinds of publications, the pitch that earns a link and why an editor accepts it. A provider that answers only with volume and turnaround is describing an inventory it did not build.
2. Establish what is paid and what is earned. Search engines publish policies against buying or selling links for ranking purposes, and paid placements are meant to be marked so they pass no ranking value. Get a written statement of what money changes hands on your behalf.
3. Look at the content behind the link. Most links come attached to something written. Ask to read three recent placements in full. If the article would embarrass you on your own site, it is not doing your brand any favours on someone else's.
4. Agree relevance before volume. A handful of links from publications your buyers actually read is a different asset from a monthly quota spread across unrelated sites. Ask each candidate to name the publications it expects to reach in your sector.
5. Price against published floors. The minority of agencies that print their pricing set the visible reference points for the market. Ask every finalist to position its quote against those published figures and to say what the lowest tier really includes.

The risk sits with you, not the vendor

Search engines are explicit that links created primarily to manipulate rankings fall under their spam policies, and that sites in breach can rank lower or drop out of results altogether. The important asymmetry is that the penalty lands on your domain, while the provider keeps the fee and moves on to the next client.

That is the whole reason to interrogate sourcing before signing. A programme that would survive a search engine tightening its enforcement looks different from one that would not, and the difference is visible in the answers a candidate gives about method long before it shows up in a report.

What a defensible programme looks like

It starts from something worth linking to. Original research, a genuinely useful tool, data nobody else has published, or expertise a journalist needs on deadline. Agencies that build this into the scope are slower and more expensive per placement, and they are buying you an asset rather than renting you a signal.

It also reports honestly on failure. Outreach has a low hit rate by nature, so a provider that reports pitches sent, replies received and placements won is telling you the truth about the work. A provider that only ever hits its number every month is either extraordinarily good or not doing outreach at all.

Ask, finally, what happens when a link is removed. Publications change owners, articles get pruned, and a real agency has a view on that. One that has never seen it happen has not been doing this long.

Verifying a candidate before you call

Agencies are listed in this index only on what can be verified from their own published pages: address, named team, printed prices where they exist, and case detail specific enough to check. Nothing here is paid placement.

Add one check of your own. Look at the links the agency has earned for itself. It is the single claim in this category that cannot be written by a copywriter, and it takes minutes.

Treat any guaranteed ranking outcome as disqualifying. Search engines state that no one can guarantee a top position, so a guarantee attached to a link package is a promise about something outside the seller's control.

Questions people actually ask

Is buying links against search engine rules?

Buying or selling links for ranking purposes is named in search engine spam policies, and sites in breach may rank lower or not appear at all. Paid placements are supposed to be marked so they pass no ranking value, which removes the benefit being sold.

How many links do I need?

It is the wrong question to lead with. A small number of links from publications your buyers read will usually outperform a monthly quota from unrelated sites, and relevance is what a provider should be arguing for in its proposal.

Why do prices per link vary so much?

Because the underlying work varies from real outreach and original content to placement on an existing network. Ask what the price buys in labour, then compare like with like against the agencies that print their rates.

How do I check a link building company before hiring it?

Read three of its recent placements in full, ask it to describe its sourcing and its failure rate, look at the coverage it has earned for itself, and confirm in writing what money changes hands on your behalf.

Browse agencies by specialty

• SEO agencies with verified facts
• PPC agencies with verified facts
• Social media agencies with verified facts
• Content marketing agencies with verified facts
• Email marketing agencies with verified facts
• Performance marketing agencies with verified facts