Adtech PR is judged by trade journalists who already understand the category and its claims

Advertising technology is covered by a small number of trade publications whose journalists know the supply chain, have heard every positioning statement before, and talk to your customers regularly. That makes the category unusually hard to spin and unusually rewarding for firms with something substantive to say. A generic technology PR approach, built on announcements and executive quotes, will produce very little coverage and some reputational cost.

Announcements are not news in this category

A funding round, a hire or a partnership will earn a short item at best. What the trade press actually covers is change in the supply chain, transparency, measurement, privacy shifts, and evidence about what works. If your company has a view on one of those backed by data from your own platform, you have something to pitch; otherwise you have a press release.

Data you hold is the strongest asset

Adtech companies sit on aggregate data about spend, delivery, fraud, viewability and pricing that nobody outside can produce. Published carefully, with method and limitations stated, it earns coverage, citations and links repeatedly. It also invites scrutiny, so the methodology has to survive an expert reader who may be a competitor.

Claims will be checked by people who can check them

Performance claims, comparative claims and privacy claims in this sector are read by journalists and customers who understand the mechanics. Substantiate anything quantitative before it is pitched, be precise about what was measured and against what, and expect follow-up questions. Vague superlatives cost credibility with exactly the audience you are trying to reach.

The audience is buyers, partners and regulators at once

Coverage in this space is read by advertisers evaluating you, by platforms deciding whether to integrate, and increasingly by regulators examining the industry. That means anything said about data practices has consequences beyond marketing. Coordinate the communications plan with whoever owns privacy and legal, rather than treating it as a trade press exercise.

Questions people ask about adtech pr

Should we use a specialist or a general tech PR firm?

A specialist already has the relationships and, more importantly, knows which stories the trade press will and will not run. In a category this small that shortens the learning curve considerably, and a generalist's first six months are usually spent acquiring it at your expense.

What does adtech PR cost?

It is retainer priced and the variable is seniority and how much of the work is analysis rather than pitching. Ask what proportion of the fee goes to research and data work, because in this category that is what produces the coverage.

How should it be measured?

Coverage in the publications your buyers actually read, whether the message survived into the article, inbound journalist requests, and whether sales conversations reference the work. Impressions and advertising value equivalence mean even less here than usual.

Is speaking at industry events worth it?

Panels are plentiful and mostly low value; a genuine data presentation or a contrarian, defensible argument is worth a great deal because the audience is concentrated. Choose on who is in the room rather than on the size of the event.

Sources

Related answers

Get your agency shortlistDescribe your project